swampdaddy/Liq-single-sided-funded-AMM
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Record answers on LIQ fungibility and proxy withdrawals

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
swampdaddy
2026-11-06 14:52:30 -05:00
parent 8b03711088
commit 2976335d5d
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
docs/open-questions.md
View File

@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@
## Backing and external redemption
- Are special-minted tokens fully fungible with ordinary LiqETH/LiqSOL, including redemption and reward rights?
- How does Liq recognize AMM-controlled assets as backing without double counting assets and token claims?
- When a trader takes LIQ out of the AMM and redeems through Liq, who supplies the native asset and how does the AMM liability change?
- Are special-minted tokens fully fungible with ordinary LiqETH/LiqSOL, including redemption and reward rights? Yes
- How does Liq recognize AMM-controlled assets as backing without double counting assets and token claims? it doesn't change, only a new mint function will be added to Liq and only this contract will be able to call it. Withdrawl will be put behind a proxy
- When a trader takes LIQ out of the AMM and redeems through Liq, who supplies the native asset and how does the AMM liability change? see latest diagram
- Can Liq draw backing directly from the AMM, or does redemption create a payable? How does either route affect reserves and the AMM curve?
- How are settled claims prevented from being paid or cancelled twice?